<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27648</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to answer the questions referred due to the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the Explanation under section 271(1)(c) properly, leading to a potential miscarriage of justice. The Court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeal, emphasizing the need for a correct legal approach and compliance with the law and observations provided in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27648</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to answer the questions referred due to the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the Explanation under section 271(1)(c) properly, leading to a potential miscarriage of justice. The Court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeal, emphasizing the need for a correct legal approach and compliance with the law and observations provided in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>