<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416784</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of a petition challenging rejection of a request to delete two partners&#039; names from a GST registration. The petitioner had failed to respond to official notices dated 27.03.2020 and 20.07.2020 regarding tax liability concerns. The court directed the petitioner to file an appropriate reply within fifteen days, and ordered respondents to consider this reply and pass suitable orders within thirty days in accordance with law. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416784</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of a petition challenging rejection of a request to delete two partners&#039; names from a GST registration. The petitioner had failed to respond to official notices dated 27.03.2020 and 20.07.2020 regarding tax liability concerns. The court directed the petitioner to file an appropriate reply within fifteen days, and ordered respondents to consider this reply and pass suitable orders within thirty days in accordance with law. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>