<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the fair market value dispute for property conversion and Assessing Officer&#039;s additions to gross profit from real estate business. It directed a fair market value of Rs. 200 per sq.ft. for settlement, stressing the need for reasonable valuation. Other issues, such as closing stock valuation and natural justice principles, were briefly mentioned without detailed resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the fair market value dispute for property conversion and Assessing Officer&#039;s additions to gross profit from real estate business. It directed a fair market value of Rs. 200 per sq.ft. for settlement, stressing the need for reasonable valuation. Other issues, such as closing stock valuation and natural justice principles, were briefly mentioned without detailed resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>