<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 235 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of CIT(A) for AY 2008-09, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal held that penalties for transactions between a partnership firm and its partners are not applicable under Section 271D, citing relevant tribunal decisions and the absence of recorded satisfaction for penalty initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 235 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of CIT(A) for AY 2008-09, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal held that penalties for transactions between a partnership firm and its partners are not applicable under Section 271D, citing relevant tribunal decisions and the absence of recorded satisfaction for penalty initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>