<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 233 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416768</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on various grounds. The disallowances under section 14A and section 35(2AB) were overturned due to the failure of the Assessing Officer to meet mandatory requirements. Additionally, the deduction for Education Cess paid was permitted after verification, following relevant case law and High Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 233 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416768</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on various grounds. The disallowances under section 14A and section 35(2AB) were overturned due to the failure of the Assessing Officer to meet mandatory requirements. Additionally, the deduction for Education Cess paid was permitted after verification, following relevant case law and High Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>