<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 231 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to vague notices and lack of specific charges against the assessee for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 231 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to vague notices and lack of specific charges against the assessee for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>