<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the adjustments made under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act were not sustainable as they were outside the scope of the section. Additionally, the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,360/- for late payments towards EPF and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) was deemed unjustified as the contributions were made before the due date of filing the return. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, following precedents from various ITAT benches and the High Court, and allowed the appeals, deleting the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the adjustments made under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act were not sustainable as they were outside the scope of the section. Additionally, the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,360/- for late payments towards EPF and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) was deemed unjustified as the contributions were made before the due date of filing the return. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, following precedents from various ITAT benches and the High Court, and allowed the appeals, deleting the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>