<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 216 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416751</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Respondent failed to prove the existence of the alleged loan, making them unable to establish Financial Creditor status under the IBC. Additionally, the application was found to be time-barred. Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside, and the Corporate Debtor was released from the insolvency resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 216 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416751</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Respondent failed to prove the existence of the alleged loan, making them unable to establish Financial Creditor status under the IBC. Additionally, the application was found to be time-barred. Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside, and the Corporate Debtor was released from the insolvency resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>