<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 205 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416740</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s direction relegating the parties to the adjudicating authority, finding no reason to depart from that view. The Court upheld the remand for appropriate further consideration before the adjudicating authority and left the Tribunal&#039;s order standing. The civil appeals were dismissed, and the pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 205 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416740</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s direction relegating the parties to the adjudicating authority, finding no reason to depart from that view. The Court upheld the remand for appropriate further consideration before the adjudicating authority and left the Tribunal&#039;s order standing. The civil appeals were dismissed, and the pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>