https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416726 The revision petition challenged the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Sessions Judge and Judicial Magistrate. The defense successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by demonstrating the complainant's lack of financial means, leading to the acquittal of one accused. The Court emphasized the necessity of proving a legally enforceable debt and the burden of proof in cases under the Act, ultimately setting aside the conviction due to insufficient evidence on the complainant's source of income. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416726 The revision petition challenged the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Sessions Judge and Judicial Magistrate. The defense successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by demonstrating the complainant's lack of financial means, leading to the acquittal of one accused. The Court emphasized the necessity of proving a legally enforceable debt and the burden of proof in cases under the Act, ultimately setting aside the conviction due to insufficient evidence on the complainant's source of income. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416726