<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1507 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found that transactions between a partnership firm and its partner, involving cash loans, did not contravene Sections 269SS and 269T of the Act if conducted in good faith. Therefore, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deemed inapplicable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1507 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found that transactions between a partnership firm and its partner, involving cash loans, did not contravene Sections 269SS and 269T of the Act if conducted in good faith. Therefore, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deemed inapplicable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>