<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1569 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that since no satisfaction was recorded for initiating the penalty under section 271D, following legal precedents, the penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 was quashed. The order was pronounced on 13-12-2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1569 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that since no satisfaction was recorded for initiating the penalty under section 271D, following legal precedents, the penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 was quashed. The order was pronounced on 13-12-2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>