<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 26 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27638</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that the assessee retains the right to appeal penalties imposed by the Wealth Tax Officer under section 18, even after the Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 18(2A) declining to waive penalties. The Court held that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner has jurisdiction to entertain appeals under section 18(2B) of the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the maintainability of the appeals before the AAC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 26 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27638</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that the assessee retains the right to appeal penalties imposed by the Wealth Tax Officer under section 18, even after the Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 18(2A) declining to waive penalties. The Court held that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner has jurisdiction to entertain appeals under section 18(2B) of the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the maintainability of the appeals before the AAC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>