<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Courts Balance Arbitration Award Clarification with Legal Soundness Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61290</link>
    <description>Validity of Arbitration Award - amicable settlement between the parties - A harmonious reading of Section 31, 34(1), 34(2A) and 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, make it clear that in appropriate cases, on the request made by a party, Court can give an opportunity to the arbitrator to resume the arbitral proceedings for giving reasons or to fill up the gaps in the reasoning in support of a finding, which is already rendered in the award. But at the same time, when it prima facie appears that there is a patent illegality in the award itself, by not recording a finding on a contentious issue, in such cases, Court may not accede to the request of a party for giving an opportunity to the Arbitral Tribunal to resume the arbitral proceedings - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:01:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Courts Balance Arbitration Award Clarification with Legal Soundness Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61290</link>
      <description>Validity of Arbitration Award - amicable settlement between the parties - A harmonious reading of Section 31, 34(1), 34(2A) and 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, make it clear that in appropriate cases, on the request made by a party, Court can give an opportunity to the arbitrator to resume the arbitral proceedings for giving reasons or to fill up the gaps in the reasoning in support of a finding, which is already rendered in the award. But at the same time, when it prima facie appears that there is a patent illegality in the award itself, by not recording a finding on a contentious issue, in such cases, Court may not accede to the request of a party for giving an opportunity to the Arbitral Tribunal to resume the arbitral proceedings - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:01:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>