<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 187 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416722</link>
    <description>The application regarding the classification of &#039;Non-Dairy Whipping Cream&#039; under the GST Tariff was rejected by the Authority due to an ongoing dispute with the Directorate General GST Intelligence, Pune. The Authority cited Section 98 of the CGST Act, 2017, which prohibits admitting applications related to questions pending or decided in other proceedings under the Act. Consequently, the application was deemed not maintainable and rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 187 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416722</link>
      <description>The application regarding the classification of &#039;Non-Dairy Whipping Cream&#039; under the GST Tariff was rejected by the Authority due to an ongoing dispute with the Directorate General GST Intelligence, Pune. The Authority cited Section 98 of the CGST Act, 2017, which prohibits admitting applications related to questions pending or decided in other proceedings under the Act. Consequently, the application was deemed not maintainable and rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>