<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416713</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on cash payments disallowance under section 40A(3) and deciding in favor of the assessee. The ITAT found the appellant&#039;s circumstances justified the cash payments, falling under the exemption in Rule 6DD of section 40A(3), deeming the disallowance legally unsustainable. However, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on interest paid to NBFCs, finding no issues with the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416713</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on cash payments disallowance under section 40A(3) and deciding in favor of the assessee. The ITAT found the appellant&#039;s circumstances justified the cash payments, falling under the exemption in Rule 6DD of section 40A(3), deeming the disallowance legally unsustainable. However, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on interest paid to NBFCs, finding no issues with the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>