<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 164 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, directing a fresh consideration of the application challenging the inclusion of a time-barred claim by Respondent No.2, as long as the Resolution Plan had not been approved. If the Plan was approved, the application would be closed. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 164 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, directing a fresh consideration of the application challenging the inclusion of a time-barred claim by Respondent No.2, as long as the Resolution Plan had not been approved. If the Plan was approved, the application would be closed. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>