<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 28 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27630</link>
    <description>The court ruled that for the Commissioner of Income Tax to invoke revision power under section 263, an assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. As the order in question was found to be erroneous but not prejudicial to the assessee, the Commissioner could not correct it. Consequently, the notices and final order based on the assessment were quashed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 28 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27630</link>
      <description>The court ruled that for the Commissioner of Income Tax to invoke revision power under section 263, an assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. As the order in question was found to be erroneous but not prejudicial to the assessee, the Commissioner could not correct it. Consequently, the notices and final order based on the assessment were quashed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>