https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299946 Proceedings arising from an FIR and a pending complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act concerned the same cheque and substantially overlapping facts. Because parallel trials before different courts could produce inconsistent findings, the Court held that the proper course was joint adjudication before one forum to secure the ends of justice. The request for quashing was declined, but the FIR-based proceedings were ordered to be transferred to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Surat, for hearing and decision together with the existing complaint. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:10:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299946 Proceedings arising from an FIR and a pending complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act concerned the same cheque and substantially overlapping facts. Because parallel trials before different courts could produce inconsistent findings, the Court held that the proper course was joint adjudication before one forum to secure the ends of justice. The request for quashing was declined, but the FIR-based proceedings were ordered to be transferred to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Surat, for hearing and decision together with the existing complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299946