<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299944</link>
    <description>Blank signed cheques issued in a settled commercial supply arrangement did not, on the admitted materials, sustain allegations of forgery and allied offences. The court treated the cheque issuance, reply notice, and account statements as consistent with an ongoing business relationship and outstanding credit dealings, while the delay in invoking criminal process after arbitration and demand notice weakened the complaint. The objection based on Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC was rejected as inapplicable on the facts. The private complaint was consequently found to be an abuse of process of court and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299944</link>
      <description>Blank signed cheques issued in a settled commercial supply arrangement did not, on the admitted materials, sustain allegations of forgery and allied offences. The court treated the cheque issuance, reply notice, and account statements as consistent with an ongoing business relationship and outstanding credit dealings, while the delay in invoking criminal process after arbitration and demand notice weakened the complaint. The objection based on Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC was rejected as inapplicable on the facts. The private complaint was consequently found to be an abuse of process of court and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>