https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299926 A regulated cinematograph exhibition business may be subjected to licensing terms, conditions and restrictions that include fixation of maximum admission rates. The Andhra Pradesh High Court treated "regulation" under the Andhra Pradesh Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1955 broadly and held that Rule 12(3) was within the State's power because rate fixation was incidental and ancillary to orderly control of theatres. It further held that the rule was not excessive delegation or ultra vires, since the Act supplied sufficient policy and guidance. The Court also found no unreasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g), noting the public-interest character of the business and the reasonableness of the regulatory safeguards. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:57:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299926 A regulated cinematograph exhibition business may be subjected to licensing terms, conditions and restrictions that include fixation of maximum admission rates. The Andhra Pradesh High Court treated "regulation" under the Andhra Pradesh Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1955 broadly and held that Rule 12(3) was within the State's power because rate fixation was incidental and ancillary to orderly control of theatres. It further held that the rule was not excessive delegation or ultra vires, since the Act supplied sufficient policy and guidance. The Court also found no unreasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g), noting the public-interest character of the business and the reasonableness of the regulatory safeguards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299926