<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete all additions was upheld, citing the assessee&#039;s provision of detailed financial information. The Tribunal found errors in the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding inadequate submissions and failure to conduct an independent inquiry. Additionally, jurisdictional issues regarding the reassessment order under Sections 147/143(3) were raised, leading to the original assessment&#039;s annulment and subsequent reopening under Section 147. The Tribunal&#039;s consideration of similar cases resulted in the quashing of the reassessment order, ultimately favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete all additions was upheld, citing the assessee&#039;s provision of detailed financial information. The Tribunal found errors in the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding inadequate submissions and failure to conduct an independent inquiry. Additionally, jurisdictional issues regarding the reassessment order under Sections 147/143(3) were raised, leading to the original assessment&#039;s annulment and subsequent reopening under Section 147. The Tribunal&#039;s consideration of similar cases resulted in the quashing of the reassessment order, ultimately favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>