<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416672</link>
    <description>Chapter XXIA of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 remains available for customs offences unless the offence is expressly excluded, and the existence of a compounding provision in the Customs Act, 1962 does not by itself bar plea bargaining. The Delhi High Court noted that the application, notice, statements, mutually satisfactory disposition, and judgment were completed in accordance with the statutory framework, so the plea-bargaining process was valid. It also stated that the sentence already undergone, the fine, and the direction to release the passport fell within the statutory limits applicable to the offence and disclosed no legal infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416672</link>
      <description>Chapter XXIA of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 remains available for customs offences unless the offence is expressly excluded, and the existence of a compounding provision in the Customs Act, 1962 does not by itself bar plea bargaining. The Delhi High Court noted that the application, notice, statements, mutually satisfactory disposition, and judgment were completed in accordance with the statutory framework, so the plea-bargaining process was valid. It also stated that the sentence already undergone, the fine, and the direction to release the passport fell within the statutory limits applicable to the offence and disclosed no legal infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>