https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416664 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to the failure to consider all invoices and relevant registers, resulting in an incorrect confirmation of the demand for alleged evasion of duty on availment of Cenvat Credit. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to reevaluate the case based on all submitted documents and registers, emphasizing the necessity of a clear finding on the missing information related to the RG 23 A Part I register. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:54:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416664 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to the failure to consider all invoices and relevant registers, resulting in an incorrect confirmation of the demand for alleged evasion of duty on availment of Cenvat Credit. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to reevaluate the case based on all submitted documents and registers, emphasizing the necessity of a clear finding on the missing information related to the RG 23 A Part I register. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416664