<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1391 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299917</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition as the respondents had already issued an order under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court stated that the petitioner could challenge this order through appropriate legal channels if aggrieved. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were directed to be closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1391 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299917</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition as the respondents had already issued an order under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court stated that the petitioner could challenge this order through appropriate legal channels if aggrieved. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were directed to be closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>