<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1227 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299906</link>
    <description>A revisional challenge was treated as not maintainable where the convicted accused had not surrendered before the appellate court when the appellate judgment was pronounced. The text states that Section 389 CrPC permits suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal, but does not leave discretion to the appellate court to invoke that provision at the stage of pronouncing the appeal judgment in the absence of surrender. It also notes that revisional interference was not warranted because both courts below had returned concurrent findings. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were left undisturbed and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 11:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1227 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299906</link>
      <description>A revisional challenge was treated as not maintainable where the convicted accused had not surrendered before the appellate court when the appellate judgment was pronounced. The text states that Section 389 CrPC permits suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal, but does not leave discretion to the appellate court to invoke that provision at the stage of pronouncing the appeal judgment in the absence of surrender. It also notes that revisional interference was not warranted because both courts below had returned concurrent findings. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were left undisturbed and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>