<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1558 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299903</link>
    <description>A writ petition was treated as a representation and remitted to the concerned authorities for decision within three weeks. The High Court issued a time-bound direction for administrative disposal and expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits, leaving substantive adjudication to the competent forum. The order is confined to procedural relief and does not determine the underlying claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 09:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1558 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299903</link>
      <description>A writ petition was treated as a representation and remitted to the concerned authorities for decision within three weeks. The High Court issued a time-bound direction for administrative disposal and expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits, leaving substantive adjudication to the competent forum. The order is confined to procedural relief and does not determine the underlying claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>