https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416649 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner's order that denied the provisional release of seized high-end wristwatches and cash. The Tribunal found the order to be unsustainable due to a discriminatory approach and improper classification of the goods as "prohibited." It directed the release of the goods and cash upon the appellant depositing the remaining balance of the duty proposed within 30 days. en-us Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416649 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner's order that denied the provisional release of seized high-end wristwatches and cash. The Tribunal found the order to be unsustainable due to a discriminatory approach and improper classification of the goods as "prohibited." It directed the release of the goods and cash upon the appellant depositing the remaining balance of the duty proposed within 30 days. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416649