https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416636 The High Court set aside the appellate court's judgment and reinstated the trial court's conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found the complainant's case credible, emphasizing the importance of consistency in evidence. The defense's rebuttal failed to sufficiently overturn the presumption of a legally enforceable debt under Section 139. The High Court highlighted the inadequacy of the defense's rebuttal and upheld the trial court's decision. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:22:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416636 The High Court set aside the appellate court's judgment and reinstated the trial court's conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found the complainant's case credible, emphasizing the importance of consistency in evidence. The defense's rebuttal failed to sufficiently overturn the presumption of a legally enforceable debt under Section 139. The High Court highlighted the inadequacy of the defense's rebuttal and upheld the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416636