<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 100 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416635</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the interest computation method, involving monthly compounding, rendered the debt not legally enforceable. The court found that the interest calculation constituted compounding, exceeding the authorized rates, and therefore, the amount specified in the cheque did not qualify as a legally enforceable debt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 100 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416635</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the interest computation method, involving monthly compounding, rendered the debt not legally enforceable. The court found that the interest calculation constituted compounding, exceeding the authorized rates, and therefore, the amount specified in the cheque did not qualify as a legally enforceable debt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>