https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299896 A criminal revision against concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour raised a maintainability issue because the petitioner had not surrendered after the appeal was dismissed. The court noted serious doubt on maintainability, observing that suspension of sentence in revision under Section 401 CrPC could be considered only when the petitioner was in custody, and no prior suspension had been granted by the lower appellate court. On merits, the cheque, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, notice, and non-payment established liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and no illegality or perversity was shown in the concurrent findings. No interference was warranted. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:22:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299896 A criminal revision against concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour raised a maintainability issue because the petitioner had not surrendered after the appeal was dismissed. The court noted serious doubt on maintainability, observing that suspension of sentence in revision under Section 401 CrPC could be considered only when the petitioner was in custody, and no prior suspension had been granted by the lower appellate court. On merits, the cheque, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, notice, and non-payment established liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and no illegality or perversity was shown in the concurrent findings. No interference was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299896