<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27609</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the premium on the issue of shares was not a revenue receipt but a capital payment. The court considered the premium akin to a capital asset, in line with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the premium should be treated as a revenue receipt. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27609</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the premium on the issue of shares was not a revenue receipt but a capital payment. The court considered the premium akin to a capital asset, in line with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the premium should be treated as a revenue receipt. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>