<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clandestine Charge Chrome Removal: Unreliable Evidence from Production Extrapolation Raises Concerns in Customs Assessments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61255</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - Charge Chrome - reliable evidence or not - To simply extrapolate the production figures of one company to determine whether there has been a suppression of production figures by another may neither be a safe or a reliable method of determining what should be the acceptable ratio of production of Charge Chrome and Charge Chrome Slag. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:31:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clandestine Charge Chrome Removal: Unreliable Evidence from Production Extrapolation Raises Concerns in Customs Assessments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61255</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - Charge Chrome - reliable evidence or not - To simply extrapolate the production figures of one company to determine whether there has been a suppression of production figures by another may neither be a safe or a reliable method of determining what should be the acceptable ratio of production of Charge Chrome and Charge Chrome Slag. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:31:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>