<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 98 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416633</link>
    <description>The HC addressed a contractor&#039;s challenge regarding non-reimbursement of differential tax amounts following the transition from VAT to GST for works contracts. The government had issued revised guidelines for works tendered before July 1, 2017, but executed partly or wholly after GST implementation. These guidelines established procedures for determining GST-inclusive work values and ensuring fair reimbursement. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority within four weeks, with the authority required to resolve the matter within three months per the revised guidelines. Coercive actions against the petitioner were stayed pending the authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 98 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416633</link>
      <description>The HC addressed a contractor&#039;s challenge regarding non-reimbursement of differential tax amounts following the transition from VAT to GST for works contracts. The government had issued revised guidelines for works tendered before July 1, 2017, but executed partly or wholly after GST implementation. These guidelines established procedures for determining GST-inclusive work values and ensuring fair reimbursement. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority within four weeks, with the authority required to resolve the matter within three months per the revised guidelines. Coercive actions against the petitioner were stayed pending the authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>