<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 86 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, denying the assessee exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, treating corpus fund receipts as taxable income, and validating adjustments made under Section 143(1). The Tribunal also rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for retrospective benefits under the proviso to Section 12A(2) due to the nature of the pending assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 86 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, denying the assessee exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, treating corpus fund receipts as taxable income, and validating adjustments made under Section 143(1). The Tribunal also rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for retrospective benefits under the proviso to Section 12A(2) due to the nature of the pending assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>