<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 83 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416618</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding the penalty proceedings invalid due to a defective notice and finding the penalty unjustified on the merits. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of clear notices in penalty proceedings and the requirement for proper justification before imposing penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=666027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 83 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416618</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding the penalty proceedings invalid due to a defective notice and finding the penalty unjustified on the merits. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of clear notices in penalty proceedings and the requirement for proper justification before imposing penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>