https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416602 The tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s. Taru Project Private Limited seeking restoration of its name in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite providing documents, including audited financial statements and plans for real estate projects, the company failed to demonstrate active business operations or sufficient grounds for restoration. The tribunal upheld RoC's decision to strike off the company's name due to a lack of business activity for two consecutive financial years, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in restoration claims. en-us Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416602 The tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s. Taru Project Private Limited seeking restoration of its name in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite providing documents, including audited financial statements and plans for real estate projects, the company failed to demonstrate active business operations or sufficient grounds for restoration. The tribunal upheld RoC's decision to strike off the company's name due to a lack of business activity for two consecutive financial years, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in restoration claims. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416602