https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299881 Bail was denied on merits because no material change was shown after an earlier refusal, and the Court found no basis to revisit the earlier assessment. On the medical plea, the Court held that the applicant had not established a cancer diagnosis, relied on misleading and forged medical documents, and could receive treatment in custody. It further held that Section 21(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 barred temporary or interim release on the grounds urged, so the application was rejected. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:25:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299881 Bail was denied on merits because no material change was shown after an earlier refusal, and the Court found no basis to revisit the earlier assessment. On the medical plea, the Court held that the applicant had not established a cancer diagnosis, relied on misleading and forged medical documents, and could receive treatment in custody. It further held that Section 21(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 barred temporary or interim release on the grounds urged, so the application was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299881