https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299870 An applicant convicted and sentenced to less than three years' imprisonment was found entitled to bail pending appeal under Section 389(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court treated the request as one for release on bail after conviction, not for suspension of conviction, and held that the trial court had misread the earlier precedent relied upon. Given that the applicant had remained on bail during trial, had paid the fine, the sentence was short, and the appeal had been admitted, no sufficient reason existed to refuse discretionary relief. Bail was granted and the substantive sentence was kept suspended. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jan 2022 16:55:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299870 An applicant convicted and sentenced to less than three years' imprisonment was found entitled to bail pending appeal under Section 389(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court treated the request as one for release on bail after conviction, not for suspension of conviction, and held that the trial court had misread the earlier precedent relied upon. Given that the applicant had remained on bail during trial, had paid the fine, the sentence was short, and the appeal had been admitted, no sufficient reason existed to refuse discretionary relief. Bail was granted and the substantive sentence was kept suspended. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299870