<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416580</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the proceedings in E.O.C.C.No.223 of 2016 under Sections 276CC, 276C(1), and 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that since the petitioner surrendered the second PAN card and filed returns for the correct PAN number, prosecution for willful default in filing income tax returns was unwarranted. The petitioner&#039;s actions to rectify the situation were deemed sufficient, leading to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416580</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the proceedings in E.O.C.C.No.223 of 2016 under Sections 276CC, 276C(1), and 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that since the petitioner surrendered the second PAN card and filed returns for the correct PAN number, prosecution for willful default in filing income tax returns was unwarranted. The petitioner&#039;s actions to rectify the situation were deemed sufficient, leading to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>