<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 31 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to the procedural irregularity of issuing the final assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity post-amalgamation. The order issued in the name of the entity that had ceased to exist was declared null and void, following Supreme Court precedents. Other grounds of appeal were not addressed as a result. The judgment highlighted the importance of ensuring the validity of assessment orders in cases of corporate amalgamations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:55:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 31 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to the procedural irregularity of issuing the final assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity post-amalgamation. The order issued in the name of the entity that had ceased to exist was declared null and void, following Supreme Court precedents. Other grounds of appeal were not addressed as a result. The judgment highlighted the importance of ensuring the validity of assessment orders in cases of corporate amalgamations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>