<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 10 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416545</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment and forfeiture order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court noted that the dispute involved factual questions requiring examination of documents and possibly evidence, making the writ forum unsuitable at the first instance. In the absence of any special circumstance justifying immediate writ interference, the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy instead.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 20:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 10 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416545</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment and forfeiture order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court noted that the dispute involved factual questions requiring examination of documents and possibly evidence, making the writ forum unsuitable at the first instance. In the absence of any special circumstance justifying immediate writ interference, the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy instead.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>