https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416543 The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision in a dispute over a promissory note and alleged material alteration. The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the claim of material alteration, ruling in favor of the respondent and emphasizing the importance of proving alterations and meeting the burden of proof under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the plaintiff's case and holding the defendant liable to pay the amount specified in the promissory note. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:54:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416543 The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision in a dispute over a promissory note and alleged material alteration. The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the claim of material alteration, ruling in favor of the respondent and emphasizing the importance of proving alterations and meeting the burden of proof under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the plaintiff's case and holding the defendant liable to pay the amount specified in the promissory note. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416543