https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416539 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, in a judgment by Hon'ble Justice Sandeep Sharma, clarified the prospective application of Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that Section 143-A can only be applied to cases where the offense under Section 138 occurred after the provision's enactment. Consequently, the court set aside the order directing the accused to pay interim compensation in a case initiated before the provision's introduction. The decision aligned with previous rulings, ensuring consistency in applying Section 143-A. en-us Sat, 18 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:54:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416539 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, in a judgment by Hon'ble Justice Sandeep Sharma, clarified the prospective application of Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that Section 143-A can only be applied to cases where the offense under Section 138 occurred after the provision's enactment. Consequently, the court set aside the order directing the accused to pay interim compensation in a case initiated before the provision's introduction. The decision aligned with previous rulings, ensuring consistency in applying Section 143-A. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 18 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416539