<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416537</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, affirming the validity of the promissory notes, the presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instrument Act, and the sufficiency of evidence presented by the plaintiff. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the court found no grounds for interference and emphasized the correct appreciation of evidence by the lower courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416537</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, affirming the validity of the promissory notes, the presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instrument Act, and the sufficiency of evidence presented by the plaintiff. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the court found no grounds for interference and emphasized the correct appreciation of evidence by the lower courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>