<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299849</link>
    <description>The CoC&#039;s decision to not shortlist SSG Group&#039;s Resolution Plan was upheld as lawful and based on the evaluation matrix, deeming SSG&#039;s subsequent plan irrelevant. CarVal&#039;s Resolution Plan was approved despite Noble&#039;s procedural violation allegations, with the CoC&#039;s majority vote deemed valid and transparent. Procedural lapses were noted, but the CoC&#039;s actions were found compliant with the law. Allegations of favoritism by SBI towards CarVal were divided, with the majority concluding SBI&#039;s actions aligned with the CoC&#039;s decision-making process. Ultimately, the CoC&#039;s decisions were upheld as lawful and in accordance with the evaluation matrix.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299849</link>
      <description>The CoC&#039;s decision to not shortlist SSG Group&#039;s Resolution Plan was upheld as lawful and based on the evaluation matrix, deeming SSG&#039;s subsequent plan irrelevant. CarVal&#039;s Resolution Plan was approved despite Noble&#039;s procedural violation allegations, with the CoC&#039;s majority vote deemed valid and transparent. Procedural lapses were noted, but the CoC&#039;s actions were found compliant with the law. Allegations of favoritism by SBI towards CarVal were divided, with the majority concluding SBI&#039;s actions aligned with the CoC&#039;s decision-making process. Ultimately, the CoC&#039;s decisions were upheld as lawful and in accordance with the evaluation matrix.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>