<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1885 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299847</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) was treated as available where a landowner substantively undertook development of a housing project, obtained approvals, retained control over the property, and only granted development rights and licence to the builder; the profit from sale of the assessee&#039;s share of flats was regarded as eligible business income. Deduction was also not denied merely because the return was filed after section 139(1) but within section 139(4), since those provisions were read together for section 80AC compliance and the later filing was treated as within the prescribed time. The assessee&#039;s claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s timing objection rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1885 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299847</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) was treated as available where a landowner substantively undertook development of a housing project, obtained approvals, retained control over the property, and only granted development rights and licence to the builder; the profit from sale of the assessee&#039;s share of flats was regarded as eligible business income. Deduction was also not denied merely because the return was filed after section 139(1) but within section 139(4), since those provisions were read together for section 80AC compliance and the later filing was treated as within the prescribed time. The assessee&#039;s claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s timing objection rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>