<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1895 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299858</link>
    <description>In anticipatory bail proceedings arising from alleged large-scale financial misappropriation, the Court held that where the record showed a prima facie financial scam, diversion of funds, possible misuse of bank funds, and a real need for custodial interrogation to trace the money trail, protection should not be granted if there is a reasonable apprehension of interference with investigation or witnesses; the Chairman&#039;s request was rejected. As to the woman Director, the material was comparatively limited, with no indication of active obstruction, absconding, or witness influence, so the balance of factors favoured protection subject to conditions; anticipatory bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1895 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299858</link>
      <description>In anticipatory bail proceedings arising from alleged large-scale financial misappropriation, the Court held that where the record showed a prima facie financial scam, diversion of funds, possible misuse of bank funds, and a real need for custodial interrogation to trace the money trail, protection should not be granted if there is a reasonable apprehension of interference with investigation or witnesses; the Chairman&#039;s request was rejected. As to the woman Director, the material was comparatively limited, with no indication of active obstruction, absconding, or witness influence, so the balance of factors favoured protection subject to conditions; anticipatory bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>