https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299857 Where a Section 138 NI Act complaint had been settled and withdrawn after the complainant received the cheque amount, and the accused offered a bona fide explanation for non-appearance when declared a proclaimed person, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC was held to serve no useful purpose. The High Court treated further prosecution as an abuse of process and quashed the impugned order, the FIR, and the connected proceedings. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299857 Where a Section 138 NI Act complaint had been settled and withdrawn after the complainant received the cheque amount, and the accused offered a bona fide explanation for non-appearance when declared a proclaimed person, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC was held to serve no useful purpose. The High Court treated further prosecution as an abuse of process and quashed the impugned order, the FIR, and the connected proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299857