https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299854 Where an accused was not served at the address where he was residing, surrendered before the trial court after learning of the proclamation order, and was granted bail, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC was treated as unnecessary and oppressive. The court view relied on the principle that once the accused has appeared before the trial court and secured bail, further proceedings for non-appearance may amount to an abuse of process. On that basis, the proclamation order and the FIR under Section 174-A IPC were quashed qua the petitioner. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jan 2022 08:53:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299854 Where an accused was not served at the address where he was residing, surrendered before the trial court after learning of the proclamation order, and was granted bail, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC was treated as unnecessary and oppressive. The court view relied on the principle that once the accused has appeared before the trial court and secured bail, further proceedings for non-appearance may amount to an abuse of process. On that basis, the proclamation order and the FIR under Section 174-A IPC were quashed qua the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299854